Common to the arguments against the current Occupation Uprisings going on across the United States and around the world is the claim that the protesters “hate business,” that by demanding a change in our economic policies and in capitalism itself, they are advocating socialism.
This linear thinking is common to the western mind. Whether it be the good/evil dichotomy, conservative/liberal or capitalist/socialist, this either/or way of thinking is what prevents us from accomplishing true change in our world. No one is ever “all good” or “all bad.” There are always varying shades of grey in between that blur any sort of lines that we might attempt to draw. Indeed, it is the very act of drawing these lines that keeps us separated and opposed to one another, rather than working together to overcome our obstacles. While we always have differences from those around us, we have far more in common than the petty differences that separate us.
To claim that the Occupy Movement “hates business,” for example, is simply ridiculous. It is not business that the occupiers are out to stop, it is greed and irresponsibility. To say that the protesters hate business is to say that businesses cannot make money without using immoral and corrupt practices. It is to say that all business people are thieves and crooks. While one might expect to hear this claim from the farthest fringes of the left, one does not expect to hear it from the supposedly “pro-business” lobby in the center and on the right. It is yet another example of the empty arguments offered by the apologists of greed. It is also an insinuation that capitalism invented business and commerce, an statement which is patently absurd.
Businesses have existed from at least as long as civilization itself, while capitalism is relatively new on the world scene. While the word capitale emerges in the 12th or 13th century, capitalism itself is not mentioned until around the 18th century. As capitalist philosophy and economics became more prevalent in the 19th and 20th centuries, it gave birth to its bastard offspring corporatism. While capitalism is defined as “an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations,” corporatism is “the organization of a society into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and exercising control over persons and activities within their jurisdiction.” While our economic system is based on capitalist ideas, it was not until the 1886 Supreme Court decision in the case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad that corporate business entities were given the same rights as natural persons under the 14th Amendment. Since that decision, corporate entities have continued to gain power and influence in our society until they have reached a point of achieving what can only be called corporatism, especially in view of the recent Supreme Court blunder in the ruling of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
By claiming that the Occupation Movement’s opposition to the continuation of this level of corporate control over our society is tantamount to socialism, the wealthiest few percent can use fear to motivate a portion of the population to advocate against their own best interests. The word socialism brings to mind the godless communism scare of the 1950s and early 1960s. Never mind that communism has all but failed worldwide and the last remaining outpost of old world communism – China – is now every bit as capitalist as the US. The scary “S” word is even brought up to invoke images of Hitler and the Third Reich, with frequent use of the term “National Socialism.”
By making the either/or argument here, by saying that our economic system is either run by laissez faire capitalism in which corporations are deregulated to the point of lawlessness or the Federal Government owns everything and private ownership is prohibited is preposterous. It is also not what most of those protesting are asking for. Sure, you can walk through the crowd at Occupy Wall Street and find a socialist or two. By then making the “guilt by association” argument, opponents of the movement claim everyone is a socialist, and that is just as dishonest as the left making the claim that everyone at a Tea Party rally is a right wing racist just because a couple of wackos show up!
The occupiers ask that soulless business entities not be given human rights and that they be held accountable for their actions; not that all private business be taken over by the Federal Government. They seek regulation, which are nothing more than laws that are applied to businesses. Corporatists and their lobbyists have long fought the battle for deregulation, claiming that regulation hinders business. That is the same as making the argument that laws that make it illegal for me to break into your house and steal your stuff inhibit my happiness and success, or that traffic laws inhibit my ability to drive from point A to point B. Laws and regulations are necessary for an orderly society. The deregulation of business is exactly what has gotten us into the economic predicament we are in and more deregulation will not fix the problem but will only make it worse.
The Occupation Movement, on the whole, is not against business and not against capitalism. We are against the practices on Wall Street that have caused the collapse of our system. We are against the privatization of public resources and of our government. We are against the unfettered involvement of business in our electoral process. We ask that corporate entities pay their fair share of the tax burden and give back to the communities that have given them so much. We ask that certain social structures not be operated for the profit of a few private individuals, areas like education, health care, prisons and natural resources. This is not socialism, it is common sense. It is not anti-business, it is pro-society. It is patriotic, for to advocate a continuation of existing practices will destroy our great nation and nothing could be more un-American than that.